ACCEPTABLE UNTO GOD– BUT NEITHER DOES HE ALLOW HIS LITTLE ONES TO BE REMAINING BLIND IN THE EVIL.
Ones are saying, “Well, now someone has come along and given us some new commandments and all this is nonsense.” No–they are simply stated in the writing as they are, no more and no less. Whether or not you or I agree with the content makes no difference whatsoever. There is a great reason for the Laws and it is not that which you accept it to be. It is not a bunch of ridiculous restrictions to make your life unhappy—- YOU HAVE DESTROYED YOUR LIFE OF HAPPINESS THROUGH THE MISUSE OF THE GREAT AND WONDEROUS GIFTS GIVEN UNTO YOU.
Dharma, I shall attempt to answer these questions in the order extended. This will be lengthy so please do not become annoyed for we shall simply not intend to write on the Journal today–or we may consider this a portion of the Journal.
We shall just dive off into the first question and hope we keep our audience long enough to read the dissertation at the end of the writing for if you do not, you will continue to not understand.
“If one is married and loves his/her mate, is it against the laws of Creation to engage in sexual intimacy if the intent is NO procreation, only mutual sharing of love through sexual intimacy? If yes, please explain the logic behind this.”
This question needs to be carefully read for I shall answer to the exactness of the question without consideration of the questions which follow: NO, if in fact–it is totally mutual and there is no ill manipulative intent involved. Further, it is YES if there is not full honor and careful consideration given to the possibility of the creating a child. The facts are that hu-man has lost his ability to discern “love” from the “act of sex”. In 999 cases out of 1000, “Love”, as such, never enters into the equation. When man and woman desire the oneness of each other they should try first to become one in energy intent. You have almost no intimacy in your relationships as you now practice them. “Sex” IS NOT INTIMACY What the Law indicates is need for total RESPONSIBILTY of your actions and not carelessly hopping into the “hay” to romp around without thought to the impact either on the partner or the possible outcome of the relationship. Your heart will know the difference. Sometimes one partner or the other might—in love—wish to “accommodate” the other but this is rare indeed, for the level of “mutual” response is far differing both in the sexes and the emotions. It is most rare indeed that one “gives” to the other in total love–it is usually more that “I may get something later if I cooperate now.”
The point, of course, is that the sexual union does have a purpose and man has forgotten that “love” is far more than ten or fifteen minutes of pleasure. Love has really nothing to do with it for it is simply a body function—further it is one body function that has pulled down your entire civilization over and over again.
It is also that God desires you raise yourself above the level of non-thinking animal and assume thoughtful responsibility for your actions. In the ultimate union there is shared intent of purpose and the total consideration of one for the other and it all takes care quite nicely, of itself.
Is there “forgiveness” for “sex in all the wrong places”? Of course–you have been trained and bribed and pushed into the actions of a current society ruled by evil. Do you not see? The damage is done and you cannot in any way change that which has gone before. It is over and done. Man did not listen nor obey the Laws and you now end up with a mess. Forgiveness is not in question–understanding of truth is the point. RESPONSIBILITY!
“If the above is yes, what if one or both partners are sterilized? Or is it against the laws of Creation because it involves self-pleasure? And if so what is the logic of this law if you are married and sex is ONE way of many you express your love for each other?”
The magic word is in the first sentence–“sterilized”. You have “come a long way Baby”. Mankind showed his disdain and selfishness when he first found sterilization. This abdicated all responsibility for his fun and games. Again, you who practiced such simply prove unto yourselves that you are people of the lie. It seemed a most propitious thing to do to prevent the further procreation of children and so it “sometimes” does. What it truly means is that, “I can now seek all that pleasure without consideration of any consequences for my fun and games.” If you have been sterilized, are you lesser in some manner? No, in fact in themes of civilization you probably are among the few thoughtful and responsible “lovers”. Forgiveness? Again, there is naught to forgive if you did these things in true belief–“ignorance” of the Law is totally acceptable. However, pronouncement of, “I didn’t know what I was doing,” when you actually did not know is one thing. To have known exactly what you were doing and you did it anyway, might need a little extra forgiveness within, and you might just “mention” it to God. Either way, forgive yourself for it is past and naught can change of it. Accept it and put it from your mind, chelas, and move on—today is the day to be considered, not your goodness nor your badness of yesterday.
I will give you a wonderful hint, however, as you pursue the path of light, the need for the misbehavior and self-indulgence shall lessen and lessen and the matter shall take care of itself. A man is that which he thinks about—when you stop thinking first on these things and turn to activities of greatness–you shall find no problem in the matter.
These thoughts which are unfulfilling in any manner whatsoever are thrust upon you from babyhood on, in the media, etc. It is purposeful in order to pull you down and claim your attention from your purpose. You are an enslaved people–to sex which is unfulfilled, to violence which stimulates sexual drives and to illicit relationships which give the old adrenaline a bit of a rush. All the while your planet goes down the tubes while you are playing around in one bed or another and having unwanted children or murdering them—all these actions harden the heart and make man savages for he loses compassion—-ALL FOR SELF.
The next time you think that “ONE” way to show love unto your mate–consider the alternatives and try it. You may find something very interesting surfaces. No, I do not denounce that interaction but in truth of the Laws as given down, I have no right to comment on my opinion at all. THE CREATION MUST, IN PERFECTION, MAINTAIN BALANCE AND MAN IS ALLOWED HIS EXPERIENCES ON THIS PHYSICAL ORB TO GROW INTO SPIRITUAL PERFECTION—WHAT YOU DO ALONG THE JOURNEY IS WHAT EITHER GETS YOU THERE IN PERFECTION OR CAUSES YOU TO RETRY UNTIL YOU DO GET IT STRAIGHT–NO MORE AND CERTAINLY, NO LESS.
“Why the differences between Cohabitation and marriage if the people are just as committed to each other in love?”
This is most excellent indeed. None. However, once again ones must look carefully at the cause and effect. Why are you cohabiting? Why would you marry? The first question always is, “Why are you not married if you have the same commitment?” Well, marriage is so carelessly entered into in this society, as is cohabitation. It is broken as easily as it is made, in contract format. It is the lack of responsibility of entering into either arrangement which is the negative component. Do you cohabit to simply have a regular sexual partner? Wrong! Do you cohabit to make it easier to break up if you should decide you do not care for each other? Wrong! Because of the first answer. A true marriage entered into in love, life intent (even if it fails) and careful, responsible thought is not a contractual piece of paper. However, again because of misuse of the procreation components– problems usually arise with the birthing of children and the financial problems, etc., etc., and has nothing to do with “contract” or responsibility.
The statistics yesterday (on TV) showed that there are $30 billion outstanding payments from “child support”. In all cases it is giving in to the lust of the moment without the willingness to bear the responsibility for the actions.
Further, birth control in all instances, is a lack of responsibility of bearing responsibility for actions—that of self-discipline and self-control in the first place. Wrong? Right? I guess you can be the judge—your planet is slipping into reversed axis because you are suffering the consequences of 5½ billion overpopulation. Can the few seconds of time spent in an open wash behind a bush in South Africa be worth even “one” of those dying, suffering and innocent children? Look into their faces and then answer me; responsibility vs. a few brief seconds of pleasure? To some obviously the response is “yes”. Well, these are the consequences.
No one shouts to train these dear beings to stop the non-responsible behavior–it is “teach them birth control”! Abstinence IS the only positive means of birth control. No one says “teach and demand abstinence of such behavior in the children”, it is “give them sex classes and show them mechanical birth control”. IT IS THE “BEHAVIOR” THAT IS WRONG- -NOT “LOVE” FOR YOUR FELLOW MAN OR WOMAN OR CHILD. IS IT LOVE THAT WOULD HAVE A FATHER RAPE HIS DAUGHTER OR SON? OF COURSE NOT–IT IS TOTAL EVIL AND YET, IT IS BEHAVIOR, NOT THE THOUGHT. IF A MAN THINKS SUCH A THING HE SHOULD GET ON HIS KNEES AND CLEAR THE THOUGHT—IT IS THE ACTION THAT DESTROYS. IF ALL EMPHASIS WERE NOT ON THESE ACTIVITIES IN EVERY FORM OF YOUR MEDIA–THE THOUGHT WOULD NOT BE THERE IN ANY CASE.
MAN HAS COME TO ACTUALLY BELIEVE THESE THINGS ARE HIS “RIGHT”. WELL, HE KNOWS THEY ARE NOT–SO HE BECOMES VILE AND EVIL IN ORDER TO LIVE WITH HIS ACTIONS.
Cohabitation and marriage–with the same measure of responsibility and equal contribution which does share and not “put upon” the mate, is the same by definition. The word Cohabitation, however, connotes sexual relationships without the benefit of contract when the act of marriage should be a desire for oneness and companionship and not “sex” as its foremost intent. Most marriages, however, are built on nothing more than “sex” and almost instantly fail for none can live up to the lie perpetrated upon you–even the very pleasure you sought will fail you.
It is not the “living” in the same dwelling which gets thee into trouble–it is what thee practices in the same bed which is the culprit. Friends can live together in great numbers and have great intimacy without so much as a touch. And yet, look in your thesaurus and you will find the accepted definition of intimacy is copulation, intercourse, etc. You see, even the word has been corrupted. Intimacy means to share that which is most precious and secret unto your soul—-that, friends, is not “a roll in the hay”.
We have discussed many, many times–homosexual “love” and homosexual “behavior”. The act of sodomy is purely a lustful and painful act—purely lustful. “Love” of one gender for another requires no “sexual” contact–although it can be most intimate indeed for there is naught to be treasured as one treasures a true friend. “Love” is surely not the possibility of giving that one you claim to love and cherish a deadly disease such as AIDS.
I did not create the disease—MAN DID! I did not proclaim that it should be spread most readily between men practicing sodomy and the mixing of blood from contaminated drug needles. Man did! These are the two prevailing ways of transmission. It becomes almost negligible after a while however, for once in the general public it spreads by any route. MAN KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE PURPOSELY CREATED THE PROBLEM—DO NOT BLAME GOD!
“Please explain the Divorce law and what is to become of someone like me who has married a divorced person? And what is to become of the man I married who was divorced?”
Not to appear trite—live happily ever-after. You married, you divorced, you remarried according to your hearts and the laws of the land. You can do nothing to change it. You certainly would not move back in time into a damaging situation to effort a rectification of something that was wrong in the first place. It is simply done. Do that which you can, to the best of your ability to have a “responsible” and “intimate” relationship with that spouse presently yours.
It is a fact, that many marriages which are consummated and the “pair” comes into this truth—are still grossly wrong for each other and shall never have peace in their relationship. There will yet be many marriages dissolved by the laws of the land for they truly were not consummated in the love of God and The Creation in the first place.
Now I shall have to move further back in time to the point in which these rules were first made “public”. In the days before, and at the time of Jesus, if a woman were to be divorced, it was that the woman would be totally destitute and had no manner of tending herself, nor that of the children for the man would usually simply walk away from all responsibility. In almost all instances the reasons for leaving were for lack of the woman’s producing an heir or for indulgence of sexual pleasures with another woman. Again, total lack of responsibility for actions.
It is not the divorce which is necessarily incorrect–it was the lack of preparation and responsibility in the original marriage. Mates were chosen incorrectly, marriages made incorrectly and nothing has changed through the centuries except the responsibility has become less and the methods different. Woman can better tend herself today—but not if she has children and men were not made to be mothers and mothers were not made to be fathers. MANKIND has forgotten that there ever was a purpose in two genders.
Again, this is not to condemn you who have changed partners–most have done so quite honorably. It is however, another instance whereby man “votes” in the laws and changes the rules when the truth is you cannot “vote in” THE LAWS OF CREATION. You can make of the action legal in the eyes of the lands–it does not make it right in the truth. It most certainly is not my desire to see any persons live in the hell of a bad relationship. I would suggest, however, that if you handled the “sexual” aspect and the “financial” responsibility properly—the divorce rate would be negligible.
This, again, is to point unto you what has gone wrong in order to bring you to the confusion, overpopulation and devastation of an ecological system of a planet which requires re-nurturing. You see, whether ones wish to consider this a prison planet or not, it is—it is, for you cannot get off this placement—you as humans cannot live in space nor travel to other inhabitable planets—the other planets which you might reach are all prior to your experience and are in the re-cleansing themselves.
Whether the Laws are pleasant or not, there was a great reason for the LAWS OF CREATION AS SET FORTH BY CREATOR–your planet was made able to sustain approximately 500 million people with a few more or less—you will now count somewhat over 6 billion! I care not what you think of restraint and procreation rules—the facts are—that is what has done you in. Man ceased using the act as “love” and “creation” and uses it for lust, control and power–all without responsible attitudes toward the partner or to the problems created.
God is now telling you what went wrong so that as the word comes forth, you come into understanding for there will again come the time when there will be rebuilding and unless you are ready, willing and able to abide by the Laws as given forth—you shall end up in this same dastardly disaster.
Dharma, this is going to be much too lengthy to conclude without a break and here it appears, is a good place to pause.
I am very indebted to my precious little D., who has carefully thought and prayed over these questions–they are not lightly asked in behalf of all of you and I accept them in
the same deep and sincere hope of responding in like manner. UPPERMOST–REMEMBER THAT WHAT IS PAST IS PAST—MUCH BROUGHT UNTO YOU NOW IS, QUITE FRANKLY, AFTER THE FACT–NO ONE LISTENED CAREFULLY AT ONSET. HOWEVER, ALL OF YOU WERE PERPETRATORS FOR THIS IS ONLY ONE OF THOUSANDS OF TIMES AROUND AND NOW, FATHER SHOWS US WHERE OUR ANSWERS AND ACTION WERE NOT CORRECT AND THAT WHICH MUST COME BACK INTO BALANCE TO MOVE INTO A NEW AND WONDROUS RADIANCE AND ALLOW THIS MARVELOUS CREATION TO HEAL AND REBIRTH. SO BE IT.
LET US LEAVE THIS FOR THE MOMENT AND WE SHALL TAKE UP THE REMAINDER OF THE QUERIES A BIT LATER. ADONAI.
SANANDA, ASIDE, TO AWAIT YOUR SUMMONS.
(Source: Phoenix Journal, #12 – CRucifixion OF THE PHOENIX, Pages 77 – 82, Speaker – SANANDA)
ADULTRY, COHABITATION AND MARRIAGE
“You have heard that it has been said: you should not commit adultery. But I tell you, he who cohabits with someone other than his spouse and practices in the manner of ones bounded in marriage with such commitment, should be caused to terminate such condition and circumstance, for it is unworthy of mankind, abhorrent and filled with lascivious selfishness for physical pleasure without thought or responsibility unto the consequences thereof. It is in creation of unbalance and disharmony for at all times does such activity impinge upon the justness one to another. If ones practice physical pleasures with ones of the same earth species of male or female, thy physical activities will be the carriers of disease and carnal consequences for it is against the natural Laws of The Creation for in thy logical reason it is most obviously incorrect and ill intended.
“If your right or left eye vexes you, pull it out and throw it away from you. It is better that only one of your limbs be ruined and not thy entire body. If a “thought” beleaguers you, then destroy it and ban it from your mind. It is better to destroy a thought that incites annoyance and subsequent invidious behavior, and not to bring the entire world of thought into an uproar. “It is further being said: he who separates from his spouse should give him or her a letter of separation. But I tell you, he who leaves his spouse except in the case of adultery (and I care not for physical, legal documentation but those, also, who do dwell in the marriage rituals), causes the marriage to break. He who then marries one who has caused such a break, is then also guilty of committing adultery.
(Source: Phoenix Journal, #2 – And they called his name immanuel *** iam sananda page 35, Speaker – SANANDA)
MARRIAGE AND COHABITATION
Jmmanuel was constantly pressed with questions regarding the laws of marriage and everything related thereto. Most ones were most sorry they had asked. These writings will be discussed in depth at a future time, Dharma, for they are the most abused and confounding of all teachings. These are Universal Laws and are the most frequently “rewritten” to be suitable to man’s whims. Nonetheless, there is most logical and rational reason for such rules which range from parentless children birthed to calamitous diseases and broken spirits thrust one upon another. Do not debate it here as this is not the format for such, remember, we are translating the scrolls. As has been given unto you prior to this; there is naught to prevent the “LOVING” of another of opposite or same, sexual affiliation–it is the “BEHAVIOR OF PHYSICAL LUST AND PRACTICE” which is disdained. LOVE has no boundaries of soul caring and emotion. Physical activities come under the limits of acceptability for myriads of “just” reasonings. So be it.
He spoke thusly, “You have been given the commandment: ‘You should not commit adultery.’
“Irrespective thereof, people commit adultery and practice fornication thus going against the laws of nature. But it is written: ‘He who commits adultery and fornication shall be punished, for the fallible are unworthy of life and its laws, for they should be sterilized.’ If men or women, not married, cohabit with each other, they should be punished for the fallible are unworthy of life and its laws, and they, too, should be sterilized.
“If two men consort with one another in intimate sexual relationships, they should be punished for the fallible are unworthy of life and its laws, therefore they should be sterilized and further, expelled and banned before the people. If, however, two women cohabit with each other, they should NOT be punished, for they do not go against life and its laws, since they are not inseminating, but bearing.
“When inseminator and inseminator are united, life is desecrated and killed, but if conception and conception are united, there is no desecration, no killing, nor creating. But activities of lustful pleasure are incorrect for this is an exploitation of nurturing and loving.
“Verily I say to you, there is no animal under the sky, which like man, would go against the Laws of The Creation and of nature. But are you not more than the animal?
“He who indulges in lustful fornication for the sake of pay or pleasure to the physical senses should be therefore, sterilized that he or she not be allowed procreation and further, should be evicted and banned before the people.
“HE WHO MOLESTS AND UNITES (COHABITS) WITH A CHILD IS UNWORTHY OF LIFE ITSELF AND ITS LAWS, AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED SO THAT HE WILL LOSE OF HIS LIFE. LIKEWISE, HE WHO INDULGES IN INCEST IS THUSLY UNWORTHY AND SHOULD BE TREATED LIKEWISE. HE WHO COHABITS WITH AN ANIMAL IS LIKEWISE UNWORTHY AND SHOULD BE TREATED LIKEWISE”
*(Now, Dharma, comes the really hard one to swallow in concept and is one of the rules that has been rewritten so many times to suit man that it has lost all conceptual meaning. It revolves around “responsibility” to the child created from the old or from the new relationship. It is always with the seeking of pleasure that all laws are broken, either through seeking of pleasure of self or greed. I do not make of the laws and it is unimportant whether or not ye ones of Earth like of them or do not like of them. There is ample reasoning upon which these Laws of The Creation are based and balanced. You will note that many times the phrase “lose–life” is included. Yes, it is that serious, chela, it just has long since the writing of the law, been ignored and hidden. It is the time of the “coming again” for the correction of these things which have caused thy civilization of man to drop into degradation. Through these very misusings have you brought yourselves unto destruction. It pleases me not, either, but so be it. At the time of accounting these things done in ignorance are most surely evaluated justly and ones are not randomly thrown into the pits of fire and brimstone. You ones need not rush out and compound thy errors, you will use wisdom in all things.)
Truth Reset 
Leave a comment